Skip to content

“Things Are as They Are … “

Out for supper, we raised a glass of a very nice Primitivo to Dad. A moment later, I was lost in thought. First I was thinking how I wished I was more like Dad, and then I thought if I was more like Dad in the way I wanted to be, I wouldn’t have had that thought in the first place. That is, he was very accepting of the status quo and if he ever wished he or his circumstances were different, he didn’t let on.

He often used to quote his old Classics master at Eton (David Simpson?) who apparently was fond of saying: “Things are as they are, and the consequences of them will be what they will be. Why therefore should we wish to be deceived?” The first sentence might be a deliberate quotation from Agamemnon (ll. 67 – 68). But maybe that is just the sort of thing that tragedians always say and Classics teachers say because they have read a lot of (Athenian) tragedy. Or all of it, since there isn’t a lot.

Anyway, this saying, which may or may not have been David Simpson who may or may not have been quoting Aeschylus, captures something about who Dad was and how he approached the world. Honest and sanguine, curious and realistic without being cynical. It wasn’t fatalism — a quality he hated; he was just willing to grapple with the world as it was rather than sit around wishing it were otherwise. He almost never complained in the sense of saying he wished for the impossible. He had mastered a profound — and profoundly engaged — kind of acceptance without a minute of meditation or reading a single book about Buddhism.

But what’s funny is that while he had this amazing attitude to the larger vicissitudes of life — for example, being wrongly diagnosed with three different kinds of cancer on three separate occasions — sometimes the little things really irritated him. I mean REALLY.

A few years ago, he had a heart attack and spent a week in hospital, on an NHS ward. The food was disgusting, the other inmates sometimes disruptive and generally NQOCD. But Dad was cheerful and stoical throughout, reading the Guardian I brought him and munching Rich Tea biscuits with diabetic jam. Instead of moaning about the comforts that had been taken away from them, he took enormous pleasure in them as they were gradually restored: when I brought him home and we ate a home-cooked supper in front of a DVD, he was in heaven.

But a couple of days later, I went out for an evening and came home to find him in a right state. “Where is the tin?” “What tin?” “The Fairy tin!” “Oh you mean the one that was finished?” When I’d come back to the house while he was in hospital, I had undertaken a massive cleaning operation which involved doing several loads of laundry. I had found a near-empty Fairy washing power tin in the cupboard, used the contents, thrown it out, and replaced it with a full cardboard box of the same product. What I didn’t know was that Dad would buy the boxes and empty them into that tin, which he’d had for a long time. For some reason, he preferred to scoop his detergent out of a metal container. And now that it was gone, with a cardboard substitute in its place, he was very annoyed with me. Usually mild-mannered and laidback, he was also capable of getting very angry very quickly and he was so confident and authoritative that his anger had an irresistible force.

After the stress of the preceding ten days, I’d had enough. I burst into tears and fled to my room. A few minutes later, Dad came upstairs and knocked on the door. “I’m sorry, darling.” As quickly as it had come, the anger was gone. And I would much rather have him here now, being irritable, than this quiet freedom to throw things out. But if I were more like him, I wouldn’t have that thought, would I?

It Is and It Isn’t

One Art

By Elizabeth Bishop

The art of losing isn’t hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster.

Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.

Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.

I lost my mother’s watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three loved houses went.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.

I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn’t a disaster.

–Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan’t have lied.  It’s evident
the art of losing’s not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.


Turkey

boatjump

In the summer of 1989, Dad and I went on a two week holiday to Turkey. I was 11, he was 54.

We shared a small, basic room in a rather faded hotel. There were frequent power cuts in the town, including one on the night of our arrival. Possibly as a result of being plunged into near-total darkness in a strange place, I had my first ever attack of existential angst that night. We sat on the balcony, under the abundant stars, and I confronted the fact that I was going to die. I asked Dad if he was afraid. He said no.

He had almost no adult company during the entire two weeks, while I made one friend who barely spoke a word of English (my Turkish, obviously, didn’t extend beyond politely ordering a Coke).

There was no sandy beach, just a strip of pebbles backed up against a concrete wall. Swimming happened off the end of a rusty jetty. There was not much to do but sit on the pebbles and swim, and I became quite ill with sunstroke. A cooling ice cream made me even sicker (did I mention those power cuts?).

On the last night of the holiday, Dad and I had a blazing row while strolling through the town and he hit me (not hard, and I believe I may have hit him first).

It was undoubtedly the best holiday we ever had.

I was at that prepubescent sweet spot: although capable of brattiness, there was no one in the world I would rather be with than my dad, and yet I was old enough and swotty enough to carry on a decent conversation. It was the last time we shared a room, until we went to San Francisco together more than twenty years later. We were very happy swimming and reading, reading and swimming. A couple of times, we chartered a boat for a day. It was a traditional wooden fishing boat called the Mavi Boncuk and it belonged to a lovely Turkish man. He didn’t speak a lot of English but he soon found a new favourite word: “‘mazin.’” No doubt he picked this up from Dad, who was easily and frequently amazed.

At least once we shared the boat with a very friendly young couple from Jersey, Andrew and Helen. We went to little bays only reachable by boat and swam. We rolled down the Turkish flag and went to the Greek island of Simi for the afternoon. The Turk and Andrew fished.

When we weren’t on the boat and I wasn’t ill, I played happily with my Turkish friend. The only English she knew was the lyrics to the Madonna song “Like a Prayer” but this proved surprisingly sufficient.

Now, it seems ‘mazin’ to me that Dad didn’t go mad with only an 11 year-old for company. But barring the last night fracas, proof if proof were needed that two weeks was long enough, I don’t recall any signs of madness. ‘

Years later, I was in L.A. and on the phone to Dad, who was at home in Belfast. I had recently seen the film Love, Actually, and was complaining about Hugh Grant’s opening voiceover, which I found sentimental. In it, he says the people who made phone calls from the planes that were going down on 9-11 all called people to say “I love you.” “Oh yes,” said Dad. “Dreadful.” It took me a moment to realise that he wasn’t talking about Richard Curtis’ script: he actually meant the people saying “I love you.” Taken aback, I asked him what he would say to me if one of us was on a plane that was going down. He didn’t think for long. “I’d say, ‘Remember what a wonderful holiday we had in Turkey?’”

Sometimes It’s Not OK

Lagan towpath, January 2010. © Barak Zimmerman

Lagan towpath, January 2010. © Barak Zimmerman

I just think it’s important to say that, lest anyone imagine that life after bereavement is a series of jolly japes interspersed with misty-eyed, rose-tinted moments.

When I sit down to write this blog, seeing the lighter side of grief and loss tends to come easily. That’s partly because I think of you, the reader, and my natural instinct is to entertain. Entertain: from the Old French “entretenir,” to keep up, maintain, support, hold together. When I’m writing, I’m holding it together.

I come from a family of hold-it-together-ers. When asked how we are, we answer “fine.” We look forward, accentuate the positive, smile. This is generally a good thing: better than coming from a family of whingers, anyway. Sometimes the façade helps shape the reality. But I also think it’s important to be able to fall apart every now and again.

There are only a couple of people in my life in whose company I feel I can safely fall apart. I don’t think I want that to change. But sometimes I’d like to find a convenient halfway point between perfectly together and total mess, a point that would let people know how unpredictable and confusing this grieving thing is and what a bloody long time it takes. Like US immigration. My visa to “business has usual” has not come through yet though it is pending.

There’s another reason why it’s been easy to bring humour to this blog. The act of sitting down to post requires a fundamentally positive attitude. It rests on the belief that communication is possible and has a point. Even when it is about the very real existence of despair, writing is an act of hope.

Two Blogs, One Post

July 1990: even without blurriness, no foundation necessary

July 1990: even without blurriness, no foundation necessary

As I was having crucial and excruciating eyebrow topiary the other day, I realized that I missed The Chronicles. I put them on hiatus six months ago to focus on The Dead Dad Diaries. But it turns out hair keeps growing during times of grief. It is still necessary to wear clothes most of the time and even to buy them occasionally. Even a tear-filled eye can alight on a Sunday style supplement and be disappointed and incensed by some of the unoriginal, sexist copy therein (oh bite me back, hand that doesn’t feed me).

One blog is about my dad, my memories of him and how I’m dealing with his death. The other blog is my take on retail, fashion, beauty, and more or less whatever takes my fancy or gets my goat. A memory while putting on makeup recently made me consider how the twain might meet in this post.

When I was 11 or 12 and had just moved in with Dad, I was big into Hi! Magazine, then a set text for the tween market (though I don’t think the word tween had been invented). Hi!, like most such media outlets, was cheerfully engaged in encouraging its young readers to buy as much stuff as possible. I gobbled up articles on “makeup bag essentials” and “your perfect daytime face” which instructed me to cleanse, tone, and moisturise, then apply foundation, concealer, blusher, powder, eyeshadow, mascara etc.

My makeup collection started with an ancient lipstick and powder compact handed down from my mum. But Hi! convinced me that this wasn’t nearly enough. I needed foundation and concealer to even out my (already perfect) skin tone and hide my (non-existent) blemishes.  I was 12 and fortunate in having very good skin even for my age. I can say that now. I’ve always been lucky with my skin, have never done much to it, and am still mostly using the same moisturiser I started on when I was, well, about 12 (Simple). But I haven’t got through 20 years entirely unscathed. My 32 year-old face is helped by a splurge of tinted moisturiser (Laura Mercier is the best, but expensive), but I almost never use foundation even now. And yet at the age when I needed it least, I was convinced I had to have it, because Hi! said so and a magazine is more trustworthy than a mirror.

There was no way my modest pocket money was going to stretch to the full complement of “essentials.” So I put the case to Dad, explaining why he really needed to buy me all this slap and backing up my arguments with the printed evidence. Poor man! Recognising that he was no makeup expert and yet questioning whether my peachy cheeks needed embellishment, he asked the secretaries at work whether they thought a 12 year-old needed foundation. Probably not, they ventured.

But Da-a-ad …

I got the makeup but was too lazy and clueless to use it much. Now when I see 12, 13, 14 year-old girls dolled up to look ten years older, I think about how much of wisdom in life — in style, writing, cooking, many things — is shedding the unnecessary or unhelpful and learning that less is more. And I think about Dad, and how well he rose to the many challenges of having a pre-teen daughter, all the new things he had to learn because of me. Also how he took me seriously and let me make silly mistakes and find things out on my own, knowing that if he tried to tell me I wouldn’t listen anyway.

That was the good kind of foundation.

Birthday Letter

Easter '82

"I wish ... "

Dear Dad

Happy Birthday. You would have been 75 today. I was going to write something for Sunday, but you hated Father’s Day, thought it was commercial nonsense, though you were gracious about any cards, presents or phone calls. You were always gracious, actually, except when you were impatient because I was speaking slowly or parking badly.

A year ago today, I came here to Belfast to visit you for a few days. You picked me up at the airport and we went out for a celebratory supper at Coco (your treat of course). It seems like a very long time ago, I suppose because a lot has happened since then. You died, I left the US after nine years, and now it looks like I’m selling your house (though, as Mum wisely says, we won’t pop the Champagne until the money’s in the bank). Mum got a new hip and certain people are having babies in above average quantities and I know you would be deeply interested in all these goings-on if you were here.

I am fine. I miss you very much and sometimes I have a little weep. I’m really glad that I was here on your birthday, and for Christmas, and that in fact we spent quite a lot of time together in 2009.

Wimbledon has just started and I wish you were here to watch a bit of it and eat strawberries. It’s not as fun now as when I was younger and had a crush on Pete Sampras and you used to call him Frisky Pete and we both agreed that he looked rather like my horse, Gypsy, because they both had a floppy lower lip.

I know you wouldn’t have wanted me to feel too much sentimental attachment to the house or to life in Belfast when you wouldn’t have done yourself. But I think it’s been good to spend some time here and to be surrounded by the things that upholstered your life before I let most of them go. It was very much “our” house and it’s full of happy memories. It’s strange to think of new people here, making their own memories, while I will move on to a new home that contains someone else’s invisible history. But it’s definitely time.

I got a cat, Dad — well he found me, really — and you would absolutely adore him. Don’t tell Soraya and Pebbles I said this (I assume that if you are anywhere they are with you), but he has a better personality than either of them, lovely though they were. He is sociable, highly opinionated and rather naughty but never ever bad-tempered. Although the vet thinks he’s about a year old, he destroys toilet paper like the Andrex puppy, chases his own tail, and is so fascinated by water that he patrols the edge of the bath while I’m in it. Unlike Lady Macbeth’s “poor cat in the adage” (catus amat pisces sed non vult tingere plantas), he is not afraid to get his paws wet, even without the promise of fish.

For a little while, I think I was semi-consciously trying to assume that the cat would not stick around (unlikely — he knows he’s onto a good thing!) or that something would happen to him (still possible), as if I could brace myself against the next loss. But of course that would never really work. You’re either in or you’re out. The shadow of loss makes love possible, and possibly necessary. I’m in.

Love

Lyds

sold

one reason why posting has been scant lately

On the Origin of Migraines

Laurie Anderson. I’ve never had particularly strong feelings one way or the other. But the other evening I had Night Waves on in the background and I heard a piece from her latest performance work, Homeland. She’s doing her portentous-spooky talking schtick, telling a story inspired by a few lines from Aristophanes’ Birds. Here’s how Anderson describes it in an interview:

“It’s about a lark, and it’s set in a time before the world began. And there was only sky at that point. No land at all. Only sky and billions and billions of birds. Then one day, the lark’s father dies. This is a big problem—what should they do with the body? There’s no land. The birds try to work this out, and days go by, and finally the lark has an idea. She decides to bury her father in the back of her own head. This is the beginning of memory.”

This little story really, um, stuck in my head. Even though I co-wrote a version of the Birds way back when, I couldn’t remember (how ironique) this bit and had to look at up. The story is there up to the burial of the father, the inverse Athena myth, but of course the lark is male and it’s Anderson who turns it into an aetiology of memory. Perhaps I like it partly because I was doing so much flying around before Dad died, and I don’t remember when I last had a real sense of home. And while Dad became increasingly land-bound in Belfast, it was never really his home and it would have felt wrong to bury him here.

Come to think of it, I did have a terrible headache when Dad was dying. Could have been the combination of stress, tears, and hospital lighting. But there are two ways of seeing everything, if only you can manage to hold them both in your head. Eerie background music and portentous-spooky voice not required.

Writing in the Dark

That’s what I’m doing off-blog, in case you’re wondering. In more ways than one. I’m writing something unlike anything I’ve done before, yes (but of course it always feels like that even if one is condemned to write the same thing over and over for eternity). But also trying to fill in some of the dark stuff which I have both consciously and unconsciously left off this blog. It’s not what you think. You won’t see it here but you may or may not see it somewhere else in another form. Not that we see darkness anyway.

I’m bringing this up because M pointed out that these posts are much less dark than my other writing. It might seem paradoxical that the death of my father should bring out my lighter side. But it’s easier to go excavating in the murky corners when it’s not you, it’s not real. In fact when M emailed me this observation, I was writing a (fictional) scene in which the lights go out (I know I owe a debt to Peter Shaffer and his wonderful Black Comedy on that one). Another spontaneous gift from the random universe, dropped at my feet as a cat would deliver a field mouse.

I have not mentioned Dad at all in this post. I mention him now.

Septimus, What Is Carnal Embrace?

THAT is one of the great first lines. I can’t get away from Stoppard it seems: we celebrated Mum’s birthday by going to see Arcadia. (I should also have remembered that the version of The Cherry Orchard which Dad and I saw at the Old Vic last summer was actually by Stoppard too). Et in Arcadia ego. Really, could anyone with any interest in theatre or literature or people or the universe NOT like this play? When I’m writing something, one of the ways in which I try to shut up the inner critics is by telling myself that the piece I’m working on doesn’t have to be about everything. The thing about Stoppard at his best, like Shakespeare, is that you feel the play IS about everything, at least while you’re watching it. Or if not everything, then everything that matters. What is the difference between everything and everything that matters, come to that? I think I have measured it out in trips to the Ormeau Recycling Centre.

Yesterday we marked two anniversaries: my mother’s birth and her father’s death. In fact neither occurred on that exact date but you know how these things go. Sunday is a good day both for church and for having people round for drinks in the garden. My granny has lived alone for twenty-five years now. I just remember my grandpa as a benevolent, quiet presence. When I was born he called me India for a while because he thought Lydia an unspeakably pretentious name.

5 months in, I have thought about the anniversary of Dad’s death and how Christmas will never be the same now. Not that it will necessarily be gloomy, but I anticipate that the death of Dad will lend a certain gravitas that the birth of Jesus never quite did for me. Yesterday, Mum brought in a dirty white tub that had been sitting outside her kitchen door since December. It was the Christmas pudding we didn’t eat on that last day with Dad. A nice idea, but a large pudding for two women and a diabetic was never really going to happen. She insists that it will be fine next year or any year in fact as Christmas puddings supposedly keep forever even if they have been drenched in dirty Dublin rain a hundred times. I can hardly wait.

Rituals. My mother’s family assemble in the same place every year to remember my grandpa. I think I will need to go into Christmas armed with rituals: Carols from Kings, Gigondas, and maybe by next December I will be ready to watch Shakespeare in Love again. Which neatly brings us back to Stoppard and must therefore be my cue to exit.